
Views: 760
|
For those that are slow between shots or, perhaps, don't need to do action or sports photography, this camera is a great way to get into prosumer digital photography. I've used it traveling with my family (my wife can use it easily), doing landscapes, and even some quick marketing photos of the tools that my company makes.
The camera has been discontinued by Sony but is readily available through the usual used channels for a fraction of the retail price. At 10M pixel and the ability to shoot at 3200ASA you won't miss out on much by not buying the latest gear. The only thing I can think of that isn't on the camera, that might be useful that is, is face recognition.
PROS:
The lens itself is, of course, Carl Zeiss 24-120 f2.8-4.8. It makes the camera heavy but the lens is excellent. The build quality has similar feel to the Contax N lenses but with a narrower barrel. At 10M pixel be prepared to see every pore on your subject's face with the sharpness of the lens. The 24mm focal length is great for landscapes and photographing groups and has slight but not disturbing pin cushion distortion and almost undetectable vignetting wide open. The feel of the big lens was balanced but does require two hands (my hands are not big) for steady shooting.
The camera has a good layout of controls that includes real button for white balance and scroll wheels for aperture and EV adjustment. Very easy to get used to in two hand operation.
The digital viewfinder on the other hand leaves a lot to be desired if you are switching from film cameras like I did. Compared to an SLR viewfinder like a Contax N, the digital viewfinder is small, dark, difficult to focus, and a little awkward to select focus points. It still has the pixellated feel even the outboard screen feels too small. The digital viewfinder reminds me of the time that I first picked up an early Canon digital SLR to take a picture for a friend after using my Contax N. In a word, YUCK.
That being said the outboard screen has all the digital features that I could ever want and more. The histagram and menu systems are easy to use (didn't require much futzing with manuals to figure out). And, of course, it is big enough to determine the general quality of the picture.
Getting the best image quality only happens in RAW mode and the biggest problem is that by using RAW, you are limited to shooting a frame every 7-10 seconds. Okay for someone like me but maybe not good for someone who is shooting action or sports photography.
I am spending all my time in Photoshop CS3 now and the photos shot with the R1 are a pleasure to work with in RAW. You won't need the latest PhotoShop to produce the best prints but CS3 is an awesome tool to make use of the image quality coming out of the R1.
Rating: 9
|